This paper considers the relationship between privileges and justifications in legal doctrine. In his discussion of the Minnesota Court of Appeal’s famous decision in Vincent v. Lake Erie Transportation Co, John Goldberg  (2015) argues that it is wrong to label the case as concerning  a ‘privilege’ of private necessity, partly on the ground that the necessity in question is functioning as a ‘denial or justification rather than an excuse’. On the other hand, James Edelman and Esther Dyer (2015) have recently rejected the application of the language of justification or excuse to the defence of duress in tort law, arguing instead that that the defence should be comprehended in Hohfeldian terms as a privilege or liberty. The paper considers the relationship between privileges and justifications in greater generality. I argue that, granted certain plausible philosophical assumptions, justifications and privileges are intimately related. The existence of a legal privilege provides all or part of the justification for the defendant’s wrongful act.

Dr Robert Mullins joined the TC Beirne School of Law in 2015. Prior to that he was a graduate student in philosophy and law at Oxford University. He completed his doctorate in legal philosophy at Oxford in 2016. He teaches into contract law and jurisprudence. His research interests are in legal philosophy, broadly construed.  

About Australian Centre for Private Law Events

The mission of the ​Australian Centre for Private Law is to foster the development and understanding of the private law through advanced theoretical, doctrinal, empirical and historical research, and the dissemination of that research through education and professional outreach. By supporting the work of its Fellows, the ACPL seeks to promote research in all areas of private law and to establish itself as a research centre of national and international importance. The core initiatives of ACPL are:

Research: To advance a deeper understanding of the structure, principles and policies of the private law through advanced theoretical, comparative, and empirical analysis.

Education: To promote, facilitate and disseminate the results of that research for the benefit of Australia’s social and economic fabric.

Professional Outreach: To engage the judiciary and members of the legal profession in discussion about the values, goals and methods of private law and the respective roles of the judiciary, the legal profession and the academy in the interpretation and reform of private law.

The ACPL embraces all branches of private law, including the law of contract, torts, trusts, equity, property, unjust enrichment, including theoretical and jurisprudential dimensions and contextual applications thereof.

Venue

Level 3, Forgan Smith Building
The University of Queensland
St Lucia
Room: 
W366